Thought I had done this, but obviously it didn’t post.
Artefact 4 displayed how Responsive websites were dealing with their content and how they went about displaying their content on a multitude of devices keeping an enhanced experience throughout. I learnt that the best way for a news site was through percentages otherwise you would get to certain resolutions and you wouldn’t get such a good experience.
I went about applying what I have learnt to one of my original artefacts. I re-created the reuters website and tried to display snippets of news in their best possible form. I wanted to add styles to my basic responsive news website to add appeal but I also wanted to compare a text based news website directly against a image based news website. How would they both compare ?
Initally looking at the image only site, I found that I was drawn to articles through the image that was displayed, I wasn’t drawn through the headlines. However the text based site I wasn’t drawn to any headlines, but it would be the first thing I read when I look at the site. This lead me to beleive imagery gets your first part of attention rather than large text.
When degrading the sites through devices, the text based website worked better at lower resolutions as you could scan down the snippets quickly to find the article you want, however the image based site I found myself scrolling and stopping at each picture, rather than scanning quick down.
From trying something new and seeing weather image news websites can benefit over a plain text site, I found a medium between the two is the best, getting some where in the middle is the best method for a responsive news website.
Since writing this the BBC have implemented my answer at http://m.bbc.co.uk/news












